Yesterday I went to the QRC Annual Lunch and State of the Sector Forum. Although the forum was quite interesting, it was irritating at times to watch the panel skirt around questions, so they could talk about something else. It was well organised, and the forum included many people of diverse backgrounds. They covered topics from the economic decline to the environmental effects of mining.
Clearly when the media gives mining a bad reputation for environmental responsibility, they do not take into account the position of the mining industry. The forum covered the topic, asking for incentives, rather than taxes (newly appointed QRC President Nicole Hollows), as well as stating the fact that many environmental improvements are introduced voluntarily before it is mandatory. Following the forum, at the QRC Annual Lunch I was seated at the Peabody table, where I was asked my view on sustainability, and whether it affected my choice of company. I think that it is not what the company is currently doing that affects my decision, but whether or not they are open to change in the interests of sustainability. So with sustainability underlying the entire day I wonder how the media is able to portray such a poor image of environmental concern by the mining industry? The forum touched on this issue briefly, stating that perhaps the lack of communication is caused by this information not getting to the public. Although it is known within the industry, public awareness is minimal.
Also, congrats to Nicole Hollows (who is already CEO and managing director of Macarthur Coal) on being appointed President of QRC. This shows females can be successful in the industry. The outgoing President, John Pegler, was honoured with a strange tall green glass award. Judging by the look on his face, he didn't really know what it was meant to be either. The guys on my table from Peabody were some of the friendliest people I've ever met, and I hope I get to see them again sometime in the future, as there was some talk of a site visit.